Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 2901 - 2920 of 6,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This post in our Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series discusses the Montana Supreme Court’s consideration of an insurer’s duty to defend in National Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am by Lee Davis
The data, apparently obtained with a phone company’s help, led to a warrantless search of the motor home and the seizure of incriminating evidence.The majority opinion held that there was no constitutional violation of the defendant’s rights because he “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone.”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
We need to dismantle this Unjust system city by city, state by state and country by country. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
Vincent de Paul School, State Judges, State Judges Are Clowns, Steven Davis, Steven H. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm by cdw
In the news “the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Georgia death row inmate Troy Davis, clearing the way for the state to resume planning for Davis’ execution. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
But in the meantime, I thought our readers would be interested in another context in which DOJ interpretations have occasioned recent controversy: the current Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court, D.C. v. [read post]