Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
The post Monday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:04 pm
Roth[Affirmed; per curiam; March 6, 2020]District court improperly found use of deadly weapon for use of stun gunJanuary 28--Tuesday--a.m.State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 10:34 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:56 am
” Jeneby’s attorney concluded the letter by stating that “if I have not heard a response back from your client by October 2, 2009, then my client has instructed me to file suit in District Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:49 am
That’s what United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm
Having covered judicial materials—court filings, opinions, and similar items regarding NSA’s bulk collection of telephony and internet metadata—we’ll move to congressional oversight of those same subjects. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
Supreme Court ever ruled that an act of Congress violated the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
An explicit statement that courts’ regulating their own procedure was a proper judicial function came a few days later, in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 4:36 am
The United States District Court in Hawaii recently addressed a clear example of the latter situation in a decision from Masuda-Cleveland v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
Paradis stated that the default rule, set by Supreme Court precedent in Lijeberg v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:46 pm
“A decision of the appellate court, though not binding on other appellate districts, is binding on the circuit courts throughout the State. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:54 pm
That judicial suspicion may have been a factor in the court's conclusion that it had jurisdiction over this dispute in the first place. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
There have been many interlocutory proceedings, but the extradition proceeding proper has now been through three courts on appeals by Dotcom: the District Court, the High Court and now the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the first Supreme Court, with six Justices. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
At oral argument last week in Setser v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
