Search for: "State v. J. P."
Results 2901 - 2920
of 4,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2011, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
” See Op. at p. 13, citing Spencer at 559. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
ADAMS v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
P. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
Moreover, I would argue that plea bargaining in this country is in a constant state of flux, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
” (Slip op. at 1 Breyer, J., dissenting). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
., Joseph P. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
The strong Pareto principle suggests that possible world (state of affairs) P is socially preferable to possible world (state of affairs) Q, if at least one person ranks P higher than Q and no one ranks Q higher than P. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
The strong Pareto principle suggests that possible world (state of affairs) P is socially preferable to possible world (state of affairs) Q, if at least one person ranks P higher than Q and no one ranks Q higher than P. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 8 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of COS v PER. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KF2120 .T66 2017Joseph P. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KF2120 .T66 2017Joseph P. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
P. 11; Estate of Martineau v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 7:43 pm
Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 11:50 pm
[footnote 65: See, e.g., James Bessen & Michael J. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:08 pm
Cal. 2009) (Ware, J.) [read post]