Search for: "State v. London" Results 2901 - 2920 of 3,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am by INFORRM
Andrew Murray is Professor of Law at London School of Economics. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by NL
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm by NL
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am by INFORRM
Dr Peter Coe, Barrister and Lecturer in Law, School of Law, University of Reading; Research Associate, Information Law and Policy Centre, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London; Editor-in-chief of Communications Law. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
[v] This reduced perception of legal transplant, in fact, can fit into a global order based on nation states and international organizations, but it cannot be adapted to the current post-modern scenario where global, national and local orders interact with each other, cultural distinctions are becoming blurred, where private is occupying the space once occupied by the public, and where transnational enterprises (TNEs) cut across continents with little geographical attachment. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
" Swift J, Cleghorn v Oldham [1927] 43 TLR 465Some would say that sport is a reflection of life itself. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
” Caroline Russell, leader of the Green Party in the London Assembly, said that the report failed to account for the ethical issues of using live facial recognition technology. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
 Regulation 2(1) of the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008 has been successfully invoked in a case involving a different scam (the sending out of letters concerning the renewal of non-existent contracts for the repair and maintenance of printers and faxes), London Borough of Croydon v Austin Hogarth [2011] EWHC 1126 (QB), 5 April 2011 (unreported and not available on BAILII -- but the Kat has a copy if you want to see it). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:59 pm
 The case is Bruce McCandless v. [read post]