Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 2901 - 2920 of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2013, 4:26 am by Darius Whelan
For further information, please contact Sinead.eaton@ul.ie10-12 April 2013:Annual Conference of British and Irish Law, Education and Technology Association, Liverpool, Englandhttp://www.bileta.ac.uk/Home/Thu. 11 April 2013:Land and Conveyancing Law: The New Law in Practice - Seminar 3 on  Selected Conveyancing and Land Law Issues, Faculty of Law, University College Corkhttp://www.ucc.ie/en/lawsite/eventsandnews/Upcoming/Land/12-14 April 2013:Religious Freedom in America, 1813 to 2013:… [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
""While the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016) 593 final) contains a number of reasonable, common sense measures (for example relating to cross border access, out-of-commerce works, and access for the benefit of visually impaired people), there are two provisions that are fundamentally flawed. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:02 am by Daniel Shaviro
There is of course whatever remains, as constitutional law, of Eisner v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Florida's Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of these corporate giants at the expense of the injured in the case of Rosado v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:37 am
Biden is only now considering a Trump-like executive order on border crossings.... [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:08 am by Susan Brenner
When he left the residence, Haney and [Winkfield] were the only people present. . . . [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Petitioner asserted that she was very shocked and did not see the termination coming, such that she asked for an explanation three times; again, petitioner was told that "some people fit in here and some people don't, and you just don't fit in. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Petitioner asserted that she was very shocked and did not see the termination coming, such that she asked for an explanation three times; again, petitioner was told that "some people fit in here and some people don't, and you just don't fit in. [read post]