Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 2901 - 2920 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
(“Child”), in the United States and seeking the Child’s return to SwedenThe Petitioner was a citizen and resident of Sweden. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
While Garay and GM were being detained in the United States, Petitioner and Son were stopped in Mexico (in route to the United States) and deported to El Salvador. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:02 am by Joel R. Brandes
Julie fled to the United States with the three children after a traumatic domestic dispute in December 2014. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
According to Father, in the spring of 2017, Mother asked Father to allow her to bring the Minor Child to the United States to visit Mother’s parents. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At Fa on First, Wen Fa talks about his experience as counsel for the petitioner in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:45 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
In what seems like déjà vu, today, March 20, 2018 the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) formally announced that the agency will be temporarily suspending premium processing service for all fiscal year 2019 cap-subject petitions, including petitions that seek an exemption for individuals who possess a U.S. master’s degree or higher. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
Issue: Whether a foreign state itself is immune from suit in the United States in a case in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are at issue, the property is located outside the United States, the property is owned or operated by an agency or instrumentality of the foreign state, and that agency or instrumentality is engaged in commercial activity in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
Obama (Kiyemba I) that “the due process clause does not apply to aliens without property or presence in the sovereign territory of the United States” does not apply to him because he was brought to Guantanamo Bay involuntarily. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:35 am by Kelly Buchanan
  An Infosheet about petitions on the Australian website similarly states: In the United Kingdom the right of petitioning the Crown and Parliament for redress of grievances dates back to the reign of King Edward I in the 13th century. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:10 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The H-1B program allows companies in the United States to temporarily employ foreign workers in occupations that require the application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and a bachelor’s degree or higher in the specific specialty, or its equivalent. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:42 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of the United States The United States begins by insisting that the court of appeals lacked ordinary appellate jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Richard M. Re
The petitioner argues in the alternative that Marks be abandoned, and the United States attempts... [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:35 pm by Michael Beder
Circuit found, as the petitioners argued, that under the FCC’s approach any smartphone would qualify as an autodialer, as any smartphone could download an app or other software with the necessary functionalities. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:37 pm by JP Sarmiento
Finally, the petitioner seeking the waiver needs to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5684 Issues: (1) Whether the petitioner’s mandatory guidelines sentence, which was enhanced under the residual clause of U.S.S.G. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 8:39 pm by JP Sarmiento
 Our client has a master’s degree in divinity in the United States and currently works for a church on an R-1 visa. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am by Dennis Crouch
”[4]  Hence the Court stated the correct rule for patent infringement as follows: But even if it be conceded that the Boyden device corresponds with the letter of the Westinghouse claims, that does not settle conclusively the question of infringement. [read post]