Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 9,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
The United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 2012, that dealt with policy interpretation of the word "use" in the context of the insurance policy. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:40 am
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) is the primary code-book that includes thousands of classifications and a tariff rate (typically ad valorem). [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
Sales v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
But that’s not true in — in most cases. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:35 am
On June 11, 2021, in Yu v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
The United States has made no representations or promises as to a specific sentence. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
And it just doesn't seem like a tenable situation to have the United States say: "If you're on the list, even if we're wrong, there's nothing you can do about it. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:09 am
Gov’t For almost four decades, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has “possessed the authority to reexamine – and perhaps cancel – a patent claim that it had previously allowed. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
This is true whether or not you you believe that the President is an "executive officer ... of the United States," because every executive officer who works under the President must take the Article VI oath.There are two plausible answers to your question. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
United States (1992), and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:03 pm
This was true despite the fact that the employees paying the fees had intentionally opted not to join the union, because the union still had a legal obligation to represent all employees within the bargaining unit, regardless of whether the employee is a member of the union. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
See EEOC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Husted v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:51 am
The few cases that I could find from other jurisdictions disagree about the propriety of the conduct: United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:51 am
The few cases that I could find from other jurisdictions disagree about the propriety of the conduct: United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Remember when she couldn't name a single Supreme Court case other than Roe v Wade? [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
To recap briefly, the document was a secret court order issued under Section 215 of the Patriot Act directing Verizon to provide "on an ongoing daily basis" all call records for any call "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls" and any call made "between the United States and abroad. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
“The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:33 am
Town of Tupper Lake v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm
Drake, M.D., today (June 24) issued the following statement on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
