Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 2901 - 2920 of 9,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 10:28 am
Righting Romm:  The Ninth Circuit blog explains how United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm by Gregory Barbee
On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, expanded the protections offered to whistleblowers under anti-fraud laws, in Lawson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:06 pm
On February 20, 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of LaRue v DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., unanimously holding that individual participants in defined contribution plans regulated by ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) can sue their plan administrator for a breach of fiduciary duty that reduces the value of their individual account. [read post]
Earlier this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion affirming a product liability plaintiff’s jury verdict in the amount of $1,200,000. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:03 am by Steven Cohen
Anne Arundel Medical Center, Inc. et al – United States District Court – District of Maryland – May 4th, 2018) involves a medical malpractice claim. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution says: “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which the Court, 7-2, refused the invitation to reconsider the dual-sovereignty doctrine, under which state and federal prosecutions for the same offense do not violate the constitutional prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 6:28 pm by Georgialee Lang
They also noted that the National Alliance is a lawful corporation in good standing and had no criminal convictions either in Canada or the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Roberts Library of Arkansas History and Art, Central Arkansas Library System) The six other death penalty cases (known as Moore et al.) ultimately reached the United States Supreme Court. [read post]