Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2901 - 2920 of 29,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by David Cohen - Guest
  Again, no, it’s not, as a majority of the Justices rejected that claim as well. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:08 pm by Troy McKenzie
As John Pottow previewed in this post, the Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in Stern v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Robert Destro
Galloway and Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
” The Court reached a similar end in Finn v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 5:00 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
The balance between access to justice vs. the goals of expediency, affordability and proportionality of the civil justice system were weighed in the case of Anjum et. al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:21 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The majority of the Appellate Court reversed the Circuit Court, once again reinstating the award over a dissent by Justice Hudson, with Justice Turner joining. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am by MBettman
On September 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
 TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia [2013] HCA 5. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
On July 21, 2010 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin decided Sands v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am by Sarah Harrington
Although PHH’s journey is over (no party sought Supreme Court review), the constitutional issue it presents may well find its way to the Supreme Court one day soon. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
  This whole notion was turned on its head in 2006 when Justice Ginsberg wrote the majority opinion in Marshall v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
 The guidelines say sentence him to life, but the district court judge sentences him to twenty years.Casto-Ponce appeals, claiming that the trial judge found that his testimony was false, but also needed to expressly say that his testimony was on a material matter as well as willful in order to tack on the two-level enhancement, which she didn't do.The Ninth Circuit agrees. [read post]