Search for: "Willing v. Willing" Results 2901 - 2920 of 16,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Here are some links relevant to this Viacom v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
 Another concern raised in a large number of opinions was that the earlier draft was ambiguous on how it would be determined whether a party constitutes a 'willing licensee'. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, the court observed that Workers' compensation qualifies as an exclusive remedy when both the plaintiff and the defendant are acting within the scope of their employment, as co-employees, at the time of injury," citing Macchirole v Giamboi, 97 NY2d 147. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed Alliance Pharmaceuticals Limited v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligible candidates. [read post]