Search for: "Wise v. State" Results 2901 - 2920 of 3,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
It is one thing, Stevens's opinion suggests, to claim sovereign inherent authority to resist the judgment of other bodies, and it is very much another thing to exercise - or decline to exercise - this authority wisely. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
And from the text:[V]irtue jurisprudence undermines Fletcher's claim that law must elevate the political above the moral. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
We previously discussed a motion filed by my Air Force Appellate Defense Division colleague Capt Tiaundra Sorrell to move up her oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 11:50 am
Britton was accused of wrongdoing, told her responsibilities would change to which she stated she could not work for her employer if they did not trust her. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 11:09 pm
The defining reforms in Texas corrections historically have come about through federal litigation: The famous Ruiz case for our adult prisons, and Morales v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 7:52 am
Earlier Age Discrimination Issues Gosselin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
That's the question recently considered by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Al Minor & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
The trial judge stated that he was taking into account "all the circumstances, including the compensatory awards already made", but it is unclear on what basis he did so. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
" Official purpose is defined to include "any other purposes" that Homeland Security thinks is wise. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
In a 122 page opus on ERISA law (download here), District Court Judge Mark Kravitz has issued a fascinating and thorough decision, Amara v. [read post]