Search for: "Any and All Under-Tenants "
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm
That requires proof of all elements of a valid sale. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 am
Due to the liability exposure, it’s a good idea for any landlord to remove all asbestos materials. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:03 am
I think I’m better suited to climbing through lofts and broken windows of the properties owned by foreign investors trying to save their tenants from burning alive. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
Spanish Court Two began in early 2010 when the plaintiff association sued the defendant under the Forcible Entry Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 12:31 am
However I think to be able to defend any claim by the tenants you will need to show that you have done all you can. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
He did of course disagree that any damages at all should have been awarded on the tort claim. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:19 am
This means that the landlord does not actually have any right to go into a tenants property at all (save in emergency such as fire) – so any rights of entry he may have must either fall under statute or be set out in the tenancy agreement. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:11 am
I’m not surprised, have you seen their tenant fees????? [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:00 pm
The parties entered into the original lease in 1985, which essentially stated that Oregon agreed to comply with all necessary laws, that the County had the right to exercise full governmental control, and that the County could cancel the lease if Oregon were to violate any of its terms or conditions. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:11 am
As such [30]… Where, as here, the tenant under an introductory tenancy gets off to a shaky start, but mends his ways for almost all of the one year period, I consider that that improvement in behaviour is capable of being a factor in deciding whether it is disproportionate for the landlord to continue to insist on recovering possession. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:11 am
As such [30]… Where, as here, the tenant under an introductory tenancy gets off to a shaky start, but mends his ways for almost all of the one year period, I consider that that improvement in behaviour is capable of being a factor in deciding whether it is disproportionate for the landlord to continue to insist on recovering possession. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:02 am
It would also provide that the subtenant would be entitled to all the bankrupt parties rights under the lease. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
The purpose of the Act is to ensure that tenants are protected from any unlawful evictions. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:09 am
‘I’m all right Jackism’ So the problems of tenants living in substandard and crowded accommodation seems remote and nothing to do with them. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
Normally an executor will take a one time commission as follows:5% on the first $200,000 of all corpus received by the executor;3.5% on the excess over $200,000 up to $1,000,000;2% on the excess over $1,000,000;and 1% of all corpus for each additional executor provided that no one executor shall be entitled to any greater commission than that which would be allowed if there were but one executor involved. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
Both the tenants and the property owners were done over badly. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am
Both the tenants and the property owners were done over badly. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:51 pm
Apartment complexes now screen for any felony convictions and will refuse felons as tenants. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
In Kerr and Baranow, Cromwell J. succinctly said the following about the rights of common law couples to claim an interest in property "cohabitation does not, in itself under the common law of unjust enrichment, entitle one party to a share of the other's property or any other relief. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:08 am
Robey objected to the intersection proposal because a prospective tenant for the property had backed out citing the CFI. [read post]
