Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 7:58 am
This decision was unanimous, with newly-confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett abstaining from participation. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
Referencing an opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett from her time on the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:51 pm
Curiously, the media maintains that Feinstein was declining mentally for years but neither reporters nor members noted it before her recent election.https://t.co/Cy0wqXzp4f It was only after she hugged Graham after the Barrett hearing that she was declared effectively incompetent— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 10, 2020 [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:13 pm
The decision was written by conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, and joined by all seven other justices who heard the case (newly appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not take part because she wasn't yet on the Court when the case was argued). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:00 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court’s newest justice, did not participate in the decision, which was argued before she was confirmed to fill the vacancy created by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am
The court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, did not participate in the case, which was argued before she was confirmed to fill the vacancy left open by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:24 am
It is also the only form of relief that can remedy some RFRA violations.Justice Barrett did not take part in the decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:54 am
Each of these was decided by an eight-member Court, as each had been argued during the October sitting, before Justice Amy Coney Barrett had been confirmed to replace Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:47 am
As discussed below, Justice Barrett’s seat on the Court may not make much of a difference. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:05 am
Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court, Justice Barrett not participating, in Carney v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm
., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020) (Coney Barrett, J.); Glasser v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm
., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020) (Coney Barrett, J.); Glasser v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett was among the justices who raised this point. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:58 pm
I think the most likely conservatives to peel off are Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, but I bet Texas gets Thomas, Alito and Barrett. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
This makes it even less likely that there will be a majority for Thomas' position (even assuming newly appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett agrees with Thomas, which is by no means certain). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:31 am
/If not himself, then he has naught/To say the things he truly feels/And not the words of one who kneels....It's absurd, but the presidential dance is almost over....By the way, that image of Amy Coney Barrett reminds me of Gort from "The Day the Earth Stood Still": [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:03 pm
“Trump’s legacy on courts still building in waning days of presidency; Senate Judiciary Committee to vote on three more lower trial court nominees, including one to replace Amy Coney Barrett”: Fred Lucas of Fox News has this report. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also was skeptical. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:37 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court’s newest justice, recused herself from the case – presumably because she participated in the case while still a judge on the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:57 am
. ____ (2020), with new justice Amy Coney Barrett siding with the majority. [read post]
