Search for: "BOX v. STATE" Results 2921 - 2940 of 5,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 11:33 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court rewrote the question in the state case — Riley v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A disclaimer at the bottom of the order screen stating the delivery fee is not a tip and encouraging customers to “reward your driver for awesomeness” may not have been enough to satisfy the mandates of the state’s Tip Act (Carpaneda v Domino’s Pizza, Inc, January 9, 2014, Young, W). [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Wood, Supervising Judge of the Matrimonial Part of the Westchester County Supreme Court, in his December 17, 2013 decision in Medina v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
During the taped interview, M.R. opened the laptop, demonstrating that the phrase `gay teen porn’ auto-populated when he typed `ga’ in the search box. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
It would appear to tick none of the boxes, and fail the distinctiveness test.Marks which are not inherently distinctive may nevertheless acquire distinctiveness through use (see the HAVE A BREAK caseas an example). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
The CAFCOn Boxing Day the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ordered that the trial judge in Kilopass Technology v Sidense Corp analyze whether Kilopass Technology should pay the legal fees incurred by its competitor Sidense Corp. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
 Doncaster had previously imported trospium chloride sold in France as “Céris” into the United Kingdom by overstickering the box with the words "trospium chloride", this being an accurate if unexciting description of the contents of the box. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]