Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 8,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 3:07 am
In today’s connected world, infringers can take advantage of U.S. commerce from outside the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
It appears that the reserved judgments in the important cases of PNM v Times Newspapers and Lachaux v Independent Print – which were both heard before Flood – will not be handed down this term. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 3:15 am
Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
A recent case, Reoforce v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am
Steven V. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Most recent decision: Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd v EUIPO, Case T-112/13 (December 2016)One can be forgiven for thinking that Nestle and Cadbury are always in court fighting over the Nestle’s intellectual property rights to the shape of the iconic Kit Kat chocolate bar, as it seems that the battle is written about almost every day. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:11 am
Back in 2016, I wrote that it was somewhat disappointing that we were still having these battles at the federal level, considering that Connecticut already had state laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
In McLane v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 11:20 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
” Briefly: At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost discusses Turner v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
Eva Blum-Dumontet has written a post for Privacy International’s website about government’s battles against encryption. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 5:51 am
Additional Resources: Kneeland v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
The House of Lords loses the plot The first seismic change in the law of defamation as it applies to the media occurred in 1999 in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:58 pm
Campbell and James V. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
I think that neither the merchants nor the card networks will be jubilant about the Supreme Court’s narrow decision yesterday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:52 am
This battle is far from over. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm
The state Supreme Court declared surrogacy agreements constitutional in a 1993 case entitled Johnson v. [read post]
