Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 2921 - 2940 of 5,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2012, 6:29 am by Michael
  The final decree will divide the property and divorce the parties. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am by Sonya Hubbard
The agreement promised to pay Robinson $2.25 million in equal installments “during the period between January 1, 2012 and March 15, 2012,” and it will pay the other $2.25 million in equal payments “during the period between July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Clark, the court ruled 7-1 that a power of attorney does not need to address arbitration specifically before an agent can bind her principal to an arbitration agreement. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:30 am by LindaMBeale
  Because "[a] crude rule of thumb is that every $100 billion of deficit reduction will cost close to a million jobs in the near term. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm by Craig Hoffman
(a wholly owned subsidiary of LocatePlus Holdings Corp.) was not an "authorized recipient" to obtain records for resale to third parties under the DPPA. [read post]
  The court identified “a squadron of red flags” in the deal warranting further review for potential collusion, including: (1) while the parties contended the deal could be worth more than $100 million, ConAgra ultimately paid out less than $8 million; (2) class counsel was receiving $6.85 million, which was seven times higher than what class members received; and (3) the proposed injunctive relief was arguably meaningless because ConAgra had sold the… [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm by Christine Swanick
Bay Mills Indian Community[1] found that the sovereign immunity of the Bay Mills Indian Community (“Tribe”) barred a suit filed by the State of Michigan (“Michigan”) to enjoin Class III gaming on the Tribe’s Vanderbilt property, land the Tribe purchased in fee located 100 miles south of its reservation. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
As with other types of litigation, the parties to ERISA actions are better served when the basic rules of engagement are followed and parties are not permitted to raise new issues for the first time on appeal. [read post]