Search for: "Doe v. Choices, Inc."
Results 2921 - 2940
of 3,249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:05 pm
Defense Council, Inc., 462 U.S. 87, 105 (1983) (stating that the relevant inquiry in determining whether an agency decision should be overturned is whether there is "a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 pm
Gartenberg v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:23 am
The Partnership for New York City Inc. joined with the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
Applied Card Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:07 pm
” Judge Grimm made a similar statement in Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:12 pm
Hammons Hotels Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:55 am
Pacor, Inc., 674 A.2d 232, 237 (Pa. 1996). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:43 am
Caterpillar, Inc., 503 F.3d 974, 980 (9th Cir.2007). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:56 pm
Riddle v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:55 am
See Anunziato v. eMachines Inc., 402 F. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:42 am
Total Holdings USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 5:52 am
Clites v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Critics argue that the disadvantage of living in such a community is that homeowners have to comply with a myriad of restrictions and covenants and failure to do so can result in fines. [4] Critics also allege that the zealous homeowners associations often times abuse their powers when enforcing the rules and penalties. [5] With the current economic crisis homeowners associations are faced with difficult choices of how to keep the community… [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:47 am
Scribd, Inc., 4:09-cv-03039 (S.D. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Does Missouri v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
