Search for: "Don Jones"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 5,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 9:20 am
” Nik then added further commentary directed at Jones. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:29 am
” Hang on — these two statements don’t jibe. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:27 am
Don’t judge people after you’ve observed only one of the many roles they play. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
Let’s set aside the fact that not “work[ing] too many hours” at a Biglaw firm is basically an oxymoron (or as Quinn wrote, “I don’t think it’s too out of school to note that Jones Day, like its peers, probably has a billing requirement for associates near 1,950 hours — even in Cleveland. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:15 am
MICHAEL JONES, “JUST IN CASE” - I DON’T HAVE ANY CONCERNS RE: CREDIBILITY, BASED ON WHAT I HAVE SEEN TO DATE [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:46 am
It has been compiled and constructed under the baton of two patent maestros, the IPKat's worthy friends Paul Cole (Lucas & Co) and Stephen Jones (Baker & McKenzie), two seasoned patent practitioners who have each been in the IP game for longer than even a well-extended pharmaceutical patent. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:49 pm
If the weekend comes and goes and we still don't get to it, there will be another Valentine's Day next year. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:49 pm
If the weekend comes and goes and we still don't get to it, there will be another Valentine's Day next year. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:07 pm
On Tuesday, Mother Jones blogger Kevin Drum suggested that we don't have effective copyright enforcement on the Internet because we just haven't tried hard enough: Something that's good enough to provide a measure of IP protection that works for the vast majority of non-supermen and isn't too unwieldy. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
I don't think so. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
I don't think so. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:01 am
Don’t get me wrong: many law firms mergers make eminent sense and create real growth. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:37 am
Don’t waste your time. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Don’t take my word for it; people who know a great deal more about [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:36 am
Heck, read the lawprofs' commentary about the Jones decision and ignorance abounds. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:43 am
'This subhed, which is the title of a article at The Atlantic, seems like a premature question to Grits, but Llewellyn Hinkes-Jones makes the case centering her critique on a Texas example. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
Employers that don’t offer prescription coverage or don’t offer insurance at all are exempt, because they treat men and women equally—but under the EEOC’s interpretation of the law, you can’t offer other preventative care coverage without offering birth control coverage, too. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:15 pm
Okay, so maybe sexually exploited children don't get you activated. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:41 am
I -- well, I say that, I don't see where it says they can't. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
But don’t say anything on Twitter, or the government can find you, and you won’t have the right to step into a courtroom and say, “that’s not right. [read post]
