Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2008, 4:05 pm
Updating this entry from earlier today on the Indiana Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of Jesus Arrieta v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:27 am
I have seen experienced counsel make mincemeat of confused respondents whose first language is not English, still less legal English. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:55 am
In Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Aviation Versicherungs AG (The Alexandros T) [2014] EWCA Civ 1010, Owners appealed against a summary judgment awarded against them in favour of the Respondent Insurers. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:33 am
The English Court made an order enforcing the award. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
In Aveta, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am
I am co-coordinating together with other African private international law experts (Richard Frimpong Oppong, Anthony Kennedy, and Pontian Okoli) an extended and in-depth version of this blog post and more topics, titled “Investing in English-speaking Africa: A private international law toolkit”, which will be the topic of an online Master Class at TMC Asser Institute on June 24-25, 2021. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm
She was also advised in English and Spanish of her right to refuse consent. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 10:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
-Gen. v Punch Ltd [2003] 1 AC 1046 at [87]-[88] in the Court of Appeal and at [95] in the House of Lords; and Jockey Club v Buffham [2003] QB 462 (Gray J). [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
The cases we have discussed on implied exclusion of Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act are composed of three variants – first, the contract designates a foreign proper law but no seat of arbitration (for example Indtel Technical Services v WS Atkins and Citation Infowares v Equinox Corporation), secondly, the contract designates a foreign seat of arbitration but no proper law, and thirdly the contract designates a foreign proper law and a foreign seat of arbitration (Dozco… [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
The case primarily rested on how a skilled person would interpret the sketchy results and conclusions presented in the abstract.An interesting point that arose was whether "the state of the art" was the abstract in Japanese or the English translation of the abstract. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
Article III’s “cases” and “controversies” limitation requires that “an actual controversy . . . be extant at all stages of review, not merely at the time the complaint is filed,” Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:59 am
Compensation for court document translations, as mentioned in a previous legal translation blog post, and the Supreme Court's decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:33 am
On February 21, 2012, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case Taniguchi v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:14 am
Case citation: eOnline Global, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:23 pm
Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
