Search for: "German v. German" Results 2921 - 2940 of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 7:47 am
Haberman successfully took a leading manufacturer of baby goods Jackel International to court for patent infringement (Haberman v Jackel International [1999] FSR 683). [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:27 am
One such ruling is Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Company [2013] EWHC 3749 (Pat), a decision of Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court, England and Wales, on 27 November 2013. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:32 am by Florian Mueller
@EP_Legal MEPs back provisional agreement on #Copyright (rapporteur @AxelVossMdEP) pic.twitter.com/ePvjXy10Xx— JURI Committee Press (@EP_Legal) February 26, 201916-9, or 64% v. 36%, does mean that, for the time being, everything has worked out just the way the proponents of the directive and Article 13 ("upload filters") wanted. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am by Emily Dai
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit proceedings for the case Trump v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:02 am by Daniel Shaviro
There is of course whatever remains, as constitutional law, of Eisner v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:28 pm
At the very end of August, this weblog hosted a guest comment by a German attorney, Thomas Farkas, in which he gave a strikingly positive slant to the deeper meaning of Advocate General Wathelet's Opinion in the controversial Nestlé v Cadbury dispute over registration of the three-dimensional shape of the Nestlé Kit Kat chocolate biscuit bar. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am by Florian Mueller
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:11 pm
The issue in Case T-589/11 Phonebook of the World v OHIM, delivered on 20th November, was whether the relevant EU public, outside Italy, would make a connection between the Italian expression  ‘pagine gialle’ and equivalent expressions in other languages of the EU. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
  This concerns the principle of exhaustion as interpreted and applied by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-128/11 UsedSoft v Oracle (see Katposts here and 1709 Blog posts here). [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:00 am by Christoph Schmon
Recent cases (Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook) have demonstrated the perils of worldwide content takedown orders. [read post]