Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 68,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Supreme Court denied Westbury's motion and Westbury appealed the court's ruling.Citing Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, the Appellate Division explained that "[on] a motion pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(7) to dismiss [an action] for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
”They certainly put Lincoln Place in its place.# # #DECISIONCollins v 527 Lincoln Place, LLC [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
Can the decision to grant removal or grant remand be appealed? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:41 pm
Avatex Corp., 715 A.2d 843 (Del. 1998) (merger operated to repeal rights of preferred granted in the articles; vote by preferred required) with Warner Communications Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:05 am
” Testa v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
& Appliance v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:09 am
From Livesay Law Office v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
‘The decision to grant the measure ex parte, and the dispensation of a security requirement, are commonly seen in Italian orders granting descrizione. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 10:34 am
The court’s recent ruling in State Farm v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:17 am
Pye v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Specifically, the DJA grants federal courts broad discretion in deciding whether to abstain from hearing the action or remanding it to state court. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Specifically, the DJA grants federal courts broad discretion in deciding whether to abstain from hearing the action or remanding it to state court. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am
[1] Hamilton v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Garcia v Polsky, Shouldice & Rosen, P.C., 161 AD3d 828, 830). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:03 am
In Restaurant Law Center et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
”Given that conflicting testimony, the AD2 agreed that it was premature to grant summary relief to the defendants, and affirmed the denial of their request to be released from the case,We’re going to bite our tongue, now ….# # #DECISIONQ. v S. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:28 pm
The First Circuit’s decision in Klauber v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
