Search for: "Houston v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 3,000
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2007, 6:10 am
The case is Nautilus Insurance Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
" State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:49 am
(Last month, the Law Blog posted that Coleman, a noted conservative appellate specialist, left Weil Gotshal for Yetter & Warden, a Houston-based litigation boutique.) [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Thomas Redding of Redding & Assoc. in Houston, will argue for John and Pamela Hinck, while Assistant to the Solicitor General Jonathan Marcus will argue on behalf of the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 12:57 am
In Buckman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:37 am
See Rider 73, Title V. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 6:32 pm
The case of Uttecht v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:51 pm
She is based in Houston and supports all accounts in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.RSVP: Please RSVP to Elizabeth Grama, v-elizag@microsoft.com, 469-775-7990. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
I'll let her tell you about it: "This past weekend, the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice hosted a conference to commemorate the 150 anniversary of the Supreme Court's ruling of Dred Scott v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 12:03 pm
Merck (Houston, TX) 5/21/07 . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
An AP story today by Charles Wilson, here picked up in the Houston Chronicle, reports on yesterday's Court of Appeals opinion in the case of A.B. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:57 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:36 am
., Executive Director of the Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race & Justice at Harvard Law School, and Johanna Wald, Director of Strategic Planning at the Institute, write movingly about the United States Supreme Court's infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:33 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
The biggest question: at what level of granularity do you need to state the "want" at issue? [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
In Morris v. [read post]
