Search for: "Howe v. Brown" Results 2921 - 2940 of 5,517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 9:27 pm
Friday the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the petition for certiorari in King v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
  It is how plaintiffs in products liability cases involving PMA devices try to get around preemption. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am by Jani
Munchkin.Similar thoughts have been echoed in the UK, illustrated by cases such as Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd, where the protected subject matter in a game was deemed to be the expression of the idea of a game, and how a game plays was seen as something which can be copied, as long as the visual and audio of that game was not.What the above case illustrates is the initial considerations of video games as a protectable subject matter under copyright. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
Tune in then to see how we’re once again able to cram next to no information into 1300 words. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center filed a “friend of court” brief in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center filed a “friend of court” brief in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am by SHG
  But that’s not how the call came. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
How the new transportation metric may affect CEQA analysis going forward is not completely clear, but what is clear is that major changes are in the works. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
The court Circuit in Pickup v Brown , 728 F.3d 1042 (9thCir., 2013) upheld a California law banning sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) on the ground that the therapy, though almost entirely talk-oriented, operated as conduct and thus fell outside a stricter First Amendment analysis. [read post]