Search for: "In re An. C."
Results 2921 - 2940
of 28,782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am
This week, another court added to 1-800 Contacts’ smouldering pile of trademark jurisprudence and granted a judgment on the pleadings (Rule 12(c)) dismissing 1-800 Contacts’ competitive keyword advertising lawsuit against its rival Warby Parker. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Future judges who aren't bound by the precedent (either because they're on another court or because they're considering a case that is a step beyond the precedent) may also be more easily influenced by a past decision that makes only a small change. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
July 12, 2022 - 1 PM: In re Responsiveads, Inc., Serial No. 88453313 [Refusal to register ResponsiveAds for advertising, marketing and promotional services and for marketing software, on the ground of mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness.] [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:53 am
To prove they’re dicta, it isn’t enough to show that narrower premises would have sufficed for the outcome. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:04 am
Apple got the law, the economics, and the technology terribly wrong in connection with (at least) market definition, she did say some great things throughout the trial, culminating in how she effectively got Tim Cook to admit that Apple's C suite doesn't give a damn about developer satisfaction. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
The department will presumably re-post the statement at some point and it would be useful to confirm that it remains unchanged and provide an explanation for the online removal (I asked and did not get a response). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
In re D.L.H., 198 N.C.App. 286, 292 (2009), rev’d on other grounds, 364 N.C. 214 (2010). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Decisionmakers might thus be more willing to compromise on a small step A, then small extension B, and then small extension C than they would have been had the larger extension C been proposed up front. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Indeed, it could be argued that many of their recommendations are already reflected in the Model Code and the Divorce Act, they’re just recommending that they be clearly articulated which is not a bad thing. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 2:10 am
SHRM’s CEO, Johnny C. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:32 pm
The 2o18 First Step Act made these sentencing changes retroactive, allowing incarcerated individuals to apply for re-sentencing. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:51 am
C. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
C-4766 (June 3, 2022). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm
” The best your spouse can do is say, “I disagree on points A, B and C” allowing you to at least define the points of disagreement for later negoatiation. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm
With Case C? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Hunt c. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Citing Hodge QC, Ch in Re St Peter & St Paul Newport Pagnell [2020] ECC Oxf 8 and Eyre Ch in Re St Nicholas, Warwick (2010) 12 EccLJ 407 at paragraph 19, he noted that “the correct approach to the removal of pipe organs has been much considered by the consistory courts”, and concluded: “[20]…The presumption in favour of a further pipe organ is more likely to be rebutted by those who can show that the preference for… [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
Recently, in In re MultiPlan Corp. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
Recently, in In re MultiPlan Corp. [read post]
