Search for: "In re April B."
Results 2921 - 2940
of 3,287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2009, 11:40 pm
This post is about two provisions in the Senate Bill 773 - the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 -- which was introduced in the Senate on April 1, 2009. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:46 am
" This despite an April 23, 2009 Federal Court ruling [13] ordering the government of Canada to seek Omar Khadr’s repatriation from the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
It was approved by the French Parliament in April but has not yet been signed into law. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 10:59 pm
Do I have to re-file on ETA Form 750? [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:42 am
See: In re General Growth Properties, Inc., Case No. 09-11977 (ALG) (Bankr. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
Judge B. [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:37 am
" The USPTO illustrated inappropriate language in the Article One request.The USPTO grant of re-exam on 27 April 09 pertains to claims 1, 7 and 18-22 of the '473 patent. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:11 pm
Rev. 708 (2009) [PDF] Robert B. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:56 am
April 3, 2009). [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:00 am
Later that day over some drinks at Sevva, this partner went into more details re the lateral they may need in early to mid '09. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:50 am
April 27, 2009) [Slip Opn., at 5]. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
"Final Draft §2.03, comment b. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:45 am
LEXIS 36253 * 2-3 (April 30, 2009). [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:52 am
In re Thor Tech, Inc., Serial No. 78634024 (April 22, 2009) [precedential].Of course, the Board found the marks to be "virtually identical," and it observed for the umpteen hundredth time that as a result a lesser degree of similarity between the involved goods is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.Thor Tech argued that the goods at issue are different because its application is directed to recreational vehicles whereas the registered mark concerns… [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:00 pm
The phrase "fair and equitable" derives from Section 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the Bankruptcy Code, which describes the conditions under which a plan of reorganization may be approved notwithstanding the objections of an impaired class of creditors, a situation known as a "cramdown. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
Holder, No. 08-495, the Supreme Court held oral argument on Monday, April 27, 2009. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:22 pm
Logical enough thinking, if you're a criminal. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am
Belmora LLC, Cancellation No. 92047741 (April 6, 2009) [precedential], the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
"Is it:(A) A death penalty case;(B) A criminal (e.g, 25-to life) case;(C) A tax case; or(D) A probate case.All of the above are, of course, possible. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:41 pm
., April 29, 2009), read opinion here . [read post]
