Search for: "J. H.1" Results 2921 - 2940 of 4,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Under BCL §623(h)(1), Capsag had 20 days after the expiration of the 90-day negotiation period, or until November 30, 2011, within which to commence a judicial valuation proceeding. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Under BCL §623(h)(1), Capsag had 20 days after the expiration of the 90-day negotiation period, or until November 30, 2011, within which to commence a judicial valuation proceeding. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:27 am by Amber Walsh
The IRS attempted to clarify the definition of a “taxable medical device” in its proposed regulations by narrowing Section 201(h)’s applicability to Section 510(j) of the FFDCA and specific FDA regulations (21 CFR 807 et seq.). [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:27 am by Amber Walsh
The IRS attempted to clarify the definition of a “taxable medical device” in its proposed regulations by narrowing Section 201(h)’s applicability to Section 510(j) of the FFDCA and specific FDA regulations (21 CFR 807 et seq.). [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:48 am by William Innes
In my view, this matter falls under the heading of Rule 147(h) the denial or the neglect or refusal of any party to admit anything that should have been admitted. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 1:52 pm by Bradley Coxe
" "Probable" is defined as "likely to happen," American Heritage College Dictionary 1090 (3d ed.1993), and as "[h]aving more evidence for than against; ··· likely," Black's Law Dictionary 1201 (6th ed.1990). [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
Leur activité porte sur le commerce et les services (import-export, petit commerce, restauration, fabrication de glace artisanale, petite hôtellerie, agence de tourisme, agence de communication, décoration intérieure, production audiovisuelle, courrier rapide, maçonnerie, etc.). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:02 pm by William Innes
On the broader issue whether wages paid to children were deductible, Justice Woods relied upon the Symes decision of the Supreme Court of Canada: [19] In considering the interplay between s. 18(1)(a) and (h), the majority decision in Symes concluded that the prohibition for personal expenditures in s. 18(1)(h) does not apply to an expenditure that was laid out for the purpose of earning income. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:09 pm
Em relação aos réus ex-dirigentes do Banco Rural, o ministro Dias Toffoli considerou que o delito antecedente à lavagem encontra-se devidamente configurado: é o crime contra o Sistema Financeiro Nacional, praticado por meio da gestão fraudulenta de instituição financeira, já analisado pela Corte. [read post]