Search for: "Kat"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 3:56 am
An avid and jealous admirer of those who possess the gift of tongues, this Kat recognises his own limitations when it comes to grappling with interesting and/or important decisions (if only all interesting decisions were important, and all important decisions were interesting, he wails!) [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:42 pm
As Kat readers are aware, humans (like many other organisms), are subject to this so-called biological cycle. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Over on the 1709 Blog, John Enser tells readers all about a new venture the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC): it's a website called Copyright Aware [a much less threatening title than Copyright Beware, which this Kat suspects the BBC must have thought about before opting for the name they now use]. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 36 [week ending Sunday 8 March] - EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) says Chairman can disobey | OHIM is too rich to be true | eLAW’s TM infringement checklist | Human right and IP | Again on Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Seiko and Seiki in Singapore | The politics of US patent law reform | Haribo v Lindt Goldbear wars | Patent trolls | Private copying | Wu-Tank and copyright | CJEU on private copying in Copydan |… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:01 am
It is posted on the EPLAW Patent Blog, here, but Wouter has kindly agreed to let the Kats reproduce it here for ease of reference. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 4:38 pm
” Now, as noted by Kat Greene at Law360 (subscription required) a federal judge here in San Francisco is chiming in on the unfortunate state of the law. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:46 am
As far as this emeritus Kat is aware from her brief Google search, no cat has ever been placed in escrow (the position may be somewhat different with respect to dogs judging by this dog t-shirt, right). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
This suggests to the Kat that such a Disciplinary Committee has never existed before so the procedure can be made up from scratch. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:19 am
Listening to the radio yesterday, this Kat learned that there is an annual horse race, run on the third day of the Cheltenham Festival, which goes by the name of the Ryanair Chase. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
This Kat's personal position is that his first instinct is always to examine any proposal for reform on the criteria of its inherent virtues and vices, rather on the bases of the legal foundation on which it was built and through which it operate. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
This Kat has already written a longish and quite descriptive post on this case for The SPC Blog, so he is happy to host a shorter, more opinionated piece written by Daniel Wise (Carpmaels & Ransford, London) who has this to say:Does an invention have a sole? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:59 am
What with Kats scattering in all directions to cover so many exciting developments, it's always good to know that the IPKat, Merpel and the blogging team have friends on whom they can rely. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:43 am
"Disallowing a simple "yes" or "no", this Kat invites readers to post their most succinct and helpful responses. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
Normally the IPKat is happy to leave recently-departed guest Kats to their own devices after they have had a six-month stint on this weblog, to give them a chance to recover, but one of the most recent guest Kats, who provided us with this post only last Sunday on whether merely offering a service constitutes the use of a trade mark under the Lanham Act, is back in action once again. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
Fellow Kat Darren, together with his EIP colleague Robert Barker, write up the Idenix v Gilead litigation over whether a document cited as prior art in a patent validity dispute over novelty is entitled to its priority date, on the jiplp weblog here. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
A list of names proposed to date is appended, most of those names being (in this Kat's purely subjective opinion) as objectionable to the USPTO, if not more so, than Comfyballs itself.Over in Europe, things may be a little different. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
A news item concerning Australia and TRIPS caught this Kat's eye last week and it seemed to him to be not merely interesting but also pretty significant -- particularly for any reader who happens to be either a pharmaceutical company or someone in need of pharmaceutical products in a country where those products can only be accessed with difficulty -- or indeed not at all. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 2:15 am
If Danny concludes that the blocked comment is fair and should be posted, he will then tell the Kats, who will make an appropriate response. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm
The fact that the BOA has accepted Pinterest’s supplemented evidence concerning its user figures in the context of showing goodwill at appeal stage will come as welcome news to internet based businesses, where success can often come fast and almost unexpected and before all IP is properly in place.For the sake of transparency, Pinterest was represented by Baker & McKenzie in the appeal where this Kat used to work when the appeal was filed. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
What does that mean copyright-wise, wonders emeritus Kat Catherine Lee? [read post]
