Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 8,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Facts: This case (PACINELLI v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
In today’s case (Ranahan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 9:24 pm
In the case of Walerowicz v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Leibstein v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:37 am
In Salera v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
In NMCCA's en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:33 am
Facts: This case (Ruiz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 1:07 pm
In the recent case of Arsenault v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:32 am
Frederico Mello and Roberto Rodrigues PinhoThe Federal Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit reversed the trial court decision to determine the invalidity of Brazilian patent PI 9708108-6, owned by Sanofi-Aventis (case Cristalia Ltda v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:01 am
These are the questions that have sparked a short and thought-provoking decision from SDNY Judge Marrero in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
In ETC Tiger Pipeline LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:34 am
Facts: This case (Kennedy v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:59 am
v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:39 am
Rule 47 of the Uniform Rules of Court lays down the framework by which security for costs can be demanded. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:18 am
The Court found no difficulty in determining that the natural inference of those provisions was that only responsibility for costs was transferred, ie that the responsibility for discharge stayed where it lay, i.e. with Owners. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 1:07 pm
In the recent case of Arsenault v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 7:53 am
Company v. [read post]
