Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 21,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2010, 8:57 am
Assuming liability is found, each culpable defendant will be severally liable for h[is] allocated share of [plaintiff's] noneconomic damages. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:41 am
In footnote 5 of its opinion, the court said that the government failed to prove that defendant accessed the network “without authorization, or in excess of authorization” under New Jersey’s state computer-crime law. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Further, the court held that because the copying of programming onto a consumer's specified hard drive space on the RS-DVR system was automatically done in response to a customer's request, the defendant was not liable for direct infringement, finding the situation to resemble "a store proprietor who charges customers to use a photocopier on his premises. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 2:02 am
In response to the plaintiff’s claim, the defendants disputed their liability for the crash, arguing that strict liability should only apply if a person is using the product as intended by the manufacturer. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:14 am
Judge Kocoras denied defendants (collectively “Lovemore”) Fed. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:24 am
" However, if your dog bites someone not on your premises and poor Fido did not pursue someone from your premises, then in order to establish liability, the plaintiff must prove the defendant's knowledge of the dog's vicious tendencies. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:08 pm
The plaintiff attempted to hold the employee’s employer liable for his injuries under the theory of vicarious liability. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:08 pm
The plaintiff attempted to hold the employee’s employer liable for his injuries under the theory of vicarious liability. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
According to Defendants, McCoy’s complaint failed to meet one particular element of La. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 2:04 pm
If a doctor fails to do so, they may be liable for the patient’s lack of informed consent. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:50 am
In a recent case before the Georgia Court of Appeals, the court took a look at circumstances in which it was less than clear that the defendant should be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
It appears that employees knew the goose was nesting on the property, but the defendants successfully argued that -- setting aside whether they could be responsible for the goose's decision to attack in the first place -- the goose is a protected species and so they were not allowed to interfere with the goose or the nest in any way. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:36 am
If you adequately protect your company’s trade secrets and discover that an individual or organization has impermissibly revealed, obtained or used that trade secret, you might be able to hold that other individual or organization liable in a civil case under DTSA (which recently increased protections for holders of trade secrets) for trade secret misappropriation, which is the unauthorized disclosure and use of confidential information. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
” The Ninth Circuit rejected the defendant’s reading of Newman. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 4:03 am
The defendant ride-sharing company filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that it could not be deemed liable for the driver’s negligence, as she was an independent contractor, not an employee. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 4:54 pm
As a result, Apple's counterclaims (unless an appeals court revives the ones the judge just threw out) are limited to breach of contract, which Epic already acknowledged in October it would be liable for should it lose its antitrust case against Apple. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 9:39 pm
The defendant police officer was dispatched but did not go to the decedent’s apartment. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:06 am
[www.bailii.org]Citing only common law principles, oral contract and common sense, the England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) has found a departed scientist liable for trade secret misappropriation of a former employer. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:47 pm
This defendant accused its insureds of fraudulently joining the insurance company’s law firm and one of the attorneys working for the law firm so that the case would have New Mexico plaintiffs and defendants, making it non-removable to federal court. [read post]
25 May 2018, 3:47 pm
This defendant accused its insureds of fraudulently joining the insurance company’s law firm and one of the attorneys working for the law firm so that the case would have New Mexico plaintiffs and defendants, making it non-removable to federal court. [read post]
