Search for: "London v. State" Results 2921 - 2940 of 4,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:38 am by J
Brent was the freehold owner of five blocks of flats in Willesden, London. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:38 am by J
Brent was the freehold owner of five blocks of flats in Willesden, London. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:07 am by Alan Ackerman
City of New London that each state can define the contours of “public use” itself. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
The en banc decision of the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”) in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am by Legal Beagle
”However, it should be noted Lord McCluskey’s initial report clearly states : “We do not suggest that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be ended. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
This is also apparent from Article 7, which states that the Directive shall not affect the right of member states “to apply or introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to employees. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:37 am by INFORRM
Website operators in the US, who allow others to post defamatory content on their web­sites, can take huge comfort from a very recent decision by the New York State Court of Appeals, Shiamili v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Extradition Treaty, protocol of signature and exchange of notes were signed at London on June 8, 1972; Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976; It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on September 10, 1976; Ratifications were exchanged at Washington on October 21, 1976; It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States of America on… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Y, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon [2011] EWHC 1477 (Admin) (15 June 2011): Hillingdon Borough Council got age assessment wrong, decision quashed by high court. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Extradition Treaty, protocol of signature and exchange of notes were signed at London on June 8, 1972; Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976; It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on September 10, 1976; Ratifications were exchanged at Washington on October 21, 1976; It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States of America on… [read post]