Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Re E can be seen in some ways as guiding interpretation of Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention ‘back on track’, following the decision of the ECHR last year in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 am
In the recent judgment, AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2011] EWCA Civ 647, the Court of Appeal held that an anti-suit injunction can be granted to restrain foreign proceedings brought in breach of an English arbitration agreement, even in the absence of an actual, proposed or intended arbitration.The dispute arose out of a concession agreement to produce hydroelectric energy between the state of Kazakhstan government (D) and a US… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm
And there’s the case of “Ramos v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Lady Justice Smith stated that it was possible in principle for an estoppel by res judicata to be created by a Tomlin Order, although it would often be more difficult to determine precisely what issues had been compromised, as the terms of a Tomlin Order would not be made public. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
DONE at the city of Washington this seventeenth day of November in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred seventy-six and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred first. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
The Vale of Glamorgan Council v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1532 (Admin) (16 June 2011): Council fails in challenge to closure if Barry Magistrates Court in Wales – wider victory for court closures plans. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
DONE at the city of Washington this seventeenth day of November in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred seventy-six and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred first. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
DONE at the city of Washington this thirty-first day of December in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred eighty and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred fifth. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (o.t.a) v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:53 am
Both cases follow Cadder v HMA [2010] UKSC 43 which involved a detainee being interviewed by the police without access to legal advice. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:53 am
Both cases follow Cadder v HMA [2010] UKSC 43 which involved a detainee being interviewed by the police without access to legal advice. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
The Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, went on assert that factors on the opposite side of scales, against the regulator stepping it. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
Lord Hoffman was far more critical in his 2009 lecture to the Judicial Studies Board. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rogers v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1459 (15 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 (16 June 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Culkin v The Wirral Independent Appeals Panel [2011] EWHC 1526 (QB) (15 June 2011) Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011) High Court (Family Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P… [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
Janet Lord and Rosemary Kayess led the afternoon session on day 3. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
Thompson [1982] Q.B. 47 and Grappelli and Anor. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
