Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 2921 - 2940 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The reason the Court had occasion to consider whether the Second Bank of the United States was validly chartered by the United States was because if it was (as the Court held it was), then it was an instrumentality of the United States and therefore immune to taxation by a state. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
God and the Illegal Alien, United States Immigration Law and a Theology of Politics by Robert W. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Rev. 2135 (2023).ICYMI: "Of Course Presidents Are Officers of the United States," says Mark Graber (The Atlantic). [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 11:30 am by Unknown
Immigration Detention and Supervision (Univ. of Chicago & United Stateless, Nov. 2022) [access]"Customary Obligation to Avoid, Reduce, or Prevent Statelessness in South Asia," Asian Journal of International Law, FirstView, 28 Oct. 2022 [open access]"D.Z. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
United States, 546 A.2d 414, 425 (D.C. 1988) (quoting Dunn) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
(citations and quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 5:34 am by Mark S. Humphreys
ERISA lawyers will be watching this United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” NECA “is a leading provider of collectible figures, games and game equipment in the United States and abroad. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
In effect, the Proposed Regulations say they are reversing the resultin United States v. [read post]