Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 2921 - 2940 of 3,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:06 am
”[7] Then, Courts analyzed whether the professionals enjoyed an exemption from antitrust law and the Supreme Court explicitly held that professionals are subject to antitrust law in Goldfarb v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:37 am
Not Among Michigan's Justices The Associated Press The notion of black-robed judges as symbols of decorum and civility seems almost laughable these days in Michigan, where state Supreme Court justices have fallen into bouts of sniping, name-calling and accusations of unprofessional conduct. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:40 am
Flack, 51 N.Y.2d 692, 700, 417 N.E.2d 84, 88, 435 N.Y.S.2d 972, 976 (1980) 2 Nebraska Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:40 am by Sean_Callanan
Flack, 51 N.Y.2d 692, 700, 417 N.E.2d 84, 88, 435 N.Y.S.2d 972, 976 (1980) 2 Nebraska Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Supreme Court also found that the allegations, if proven, would establish that Jacqueline Marshall owed a duty of care to the decedent. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 537 N.Y.S.2d 26 (N.Y. 1988), the court held that federal estate tax credits that the decedent would have received had he lived longer could not be recovered in a wrongful death action absent express legislative authority. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lowe in which Supreme Court declined to consider an expert affidavit, as no CPLR 3101 had been filed prior to the motion. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:26 am by Evan Shultz
  It held that the district court’s instruction was proper because it “paraphrase[d]” the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rogers v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The question is not whether the in-court witness’s testimony had added value, but whether the out-of-court report was presented for its truth. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
Yet, only a few years later, Cardoza would go on to the Supreme Court and play a major role in the judiciary for most of the 1930s. [read post]