Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
In the judicial context, there is wide-ranging disagreement about what precisely constitutes a "precedent. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:02 am
That brings us back to the Allen case. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Virginia Pharmacy and Bolger teach us that native content cannot be commercial speech simply because it is a paid advertisement, or because money was paid to place the content on a website. [10] As the Court reasoned in these cases and many others, a hard-and-fast rule like this would mean political advertisements, traditionally protected First Amendment speech, would be “commercial speech. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
The AG concluded that the EUIPO assessment failed to meet these standards in the present case. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Like Texas, the Kansas legislature passed a ban on standard D&E abortions, the method used in 95% of second-trimester abortions. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
The new case is Gourdine v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
More precisely, the vast majority of landmark CISG cases have come from the judicial realm, including the well-known and controversial cases such as the New Zealand mussels case, Zapata Hermanos v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Aug. 31, 2012), sent to us by Janelle Davis of Thompson & Knight, although we must admit Romero does have its moments.Romero evaluates a variety of claims purportedly arising under Texas law, in the wake of the big win in Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
See NLRB v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
Cohen v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:58 am
The case was patterned on a highly controversial one, Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
And that’s precisely what I’d like to do this afternoon. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:57 am
More precisely, he found that because Cassidy was charged with violating § 2261A(2)(A) by “causing substantial emotional distress to A.Z. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:57 am
S.D. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
” White v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:39 am
Notes for--Planned Parenthood of SE PA v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
Increased judicial scrutiny may also lead to a rise in challenges to noncompetition agreements, potentially limiting their use and effectiveness.8. [read post]
