Search for: "Parks v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 10,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2012, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am
Returning the land: Native Americans and national parks. [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:22 pm
Conflict of Laws: NJ law applied where a special state interest existedSpiros v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:23 pm
The Board applied the subsequent application doctrine set forth in Fisher v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am
United States (Federal Fiduciary Duty)Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County (Rights-of-Way)Wilhite v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In Pimentel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
On April 2, 2020, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal (Division 5) filed its published opinion in Coalition for an Equitable Westlake/MacArthur Park v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
’ State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
The Court of Appeals holds that the police had the right to detain a driver and his passengers while they searched the car for contraband (finding nothing) even though there was no probable cause to detain these people.The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:46 pm
While a New York Court of Appeals ruling, People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
This appeal followed.On appeal, the Third Circuit, in Carman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
Fleetwood Park Development, LLC, 111 A.D.3d 681, 974 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dep’t 2013); Drapaniotis v. 36-08 33rd Street Corp., 48 A.D. 3d 736, 853 N.Y.S.2d 356 (2d Dep’t 2008; Sager v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:50 pm
Fleetwood Park Development, LLC, 111 A.D.3d 681, 974 N.Y.S.2d 573 (2d Dep’t 2013); Drapaniotis v. 36-08 33rd Street Corp., 48 A.D. 3d 736, 853 N.Y.S.2d 356 (2d Dep’t 2008; Sager v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:30 am
[and] ensure[ ] that the labeling ban will fail to achieve that end"); City of Cincinnati v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:48 am
SCOTUS Interprets SLUSA Narrowly: Rare Win for Plaintiffs Securities Bar Here's an excerpt from this Gibson Dunn memo (other memos are posted in our "Blue Sky" Practice Area): On February 26, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
