Search for: "People v David S." Results 2921 - 2940 of 5,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 2:00 am by SOG Staff
  Jamie blogged earlier this week about the Supreme Court’s ruling in Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
” Elsewhere in the news the Chicago Tribune’s David Savage and James Vicini of Reuters James Vicini both discuss Astrue v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 9:40 am by Susan Brenner
This post is about the Supreme Court of Michigan’s decision in People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 11:55 pm
The construction of an ecological civilization requires a global effort to improve peoples well-being while guaranteeing the future of the country. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm by Tom Ginsburg
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:37 am
How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Bennie contacted Nebraska Governor David Heineman and told him the department was targeting Bennie and “harassing [Bennie] because of his political views. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:07 am by Nassiri Law
Because of a precedent set by the 2008 Supreme Court decision in the case of Gross v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
The Supreme Peoples Court of China ruling might be a game changer. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Private Member’s Bill on SLAPPs, introduced by backbench Labour MP, Wayne David, has had its second reading in the House of Commons. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
     Fifth Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry         CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am by Simmons & Schiavo
The high court’s ruling meant people who bought the condo units lost their homes with no compensation. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
  YSL's Tribute shoe R is for red:  Last Thursday, the final order in the infamous Louboutin v Yves Saint Laurent case involving Louboutin’s red soles trade mark was entered in district court in the Southern District of New York (see previous AmeriKat reporting on the case here). [read post]