Search for: "People v. Day" Results 2921 - 2940 of 23,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2021, 3:00 am by Unknown
In the days after the attack,  I saw pictures of the Amberjack V- my boat- rescuing people from Battery Park on 9/11 and taking them to New Jersey- anywhere in NY was thought to be too dangerous. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am by Steve Erickson
I hope to have more thoughts in the coming days. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, certain employers (that employ more than 50 people) must allow people time off to care for "serious medical conditions. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 8:45 am
  So far, so good.In 2006, the California Supreme Court held in People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:04 pm
In any event, this turns out to have yielded a considerable amount of caselaw, most recently People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  So the case was about whether such a defence was valid in our law (not – yet – whether it applied on the merits of the case, which is for another day). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:40 am by Nathan Koppel
Ginsburg cited the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
” He alleges it did nothing of the sort, and also contained an ingredient, yohimbe, that is dangerous for some people. [read post]