Search for: "People v. Givens" Results 2921 - 2940 of 17,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 11:28 am
"Anyone would have a hard time arguing that people of Barre and the rest of the state wouldn't be better served by an expansion of sex offender registry," he said. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:35 am
Our adversarial system depends on the principle that all sides to a dispute must be given the opportunity to fully advocate their views of the issues presented in a case. . . . [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:22 am
  Why not trust a jury of twelve reasonable people? [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
During discovery, McDonald's produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 2:16 pm
 The justification for (1) would be inconsistent with the justification for (2).It'd be -- ironically enough, given the topic -- inconsistent for the judiciary to so hold.Now, Judge Kozinski might perhaps respond:  "Hey, dude, I just enforce the rules, I don't make 'em. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The overwhelming amount of attention has been given to Judge Boldt’s subsequent decision in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The question arose in the case of Getup Ltd. v Electoral Commissioner [2010] FCA 869, whether this signature could be electronic, and if so, what kind of e-signature would be satisfactory. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:35 am by Juggalo Law
That guy.Now that Christian conservative groups have given up trying to convince young people that gay marriage is wrong, they can redouble their efforts on the cinematic front. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:39 am by Eilionoir Flynn
The first of these was the judgement issued by the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights in May 2010 on the case of Alajos Kiss v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Additionally, Judge Seeger then said the courts are not bound to follow decisions of equal or inferior courts, citing People v. [read post]