Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 2921 - 2940 of 16,979
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by John Elwood
The provision in question, Section 1806(f) of FISA, establishes procedures for people to seek to suppress FISA evidence that will be introduced against them. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:36 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The test originated in the foundational case of Bardal v Globe and Mail Ltd., a 1960 Ontario decision. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In keeping with this uncertainty, just yesterday, the Supreme Court granted, vacated, and remanded (GVRed) in Sanders v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 2:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
This understanding is also consistent with the purpose of the OPMA, which is to grant the people of the state of Washington the right to be informed and retain control over governmental agencies. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am by Richard Hunt
There are, however, some cases dealing addressing important substantive issues, and few in which Courts seem ready to turn the ADA and FHA into laws to help people instead of laws to make lawyers rich. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am by SHG
But then there are cases like Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 4:45 am by SHG
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am by John Elwood
New Mexico, involving the admissibility of expert reports under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, the court granted review in Williams v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Haaland (National Historic Preservation Act; Religious Freedom Restoration Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Petitioner/Cross-Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Children: K.C. and L.C., v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Unknown
Haaland (National Historic Preservation Act; Religious Freedom Restoration Act)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlPetitioner/Cross-Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Children: K.C. and L.C., v. [read post]