Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 15,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
It's not just a question of power, it's knowing what to do with it ... [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:15 pm
New York Supreme Court Justice Thomas Marcelle ruled Monday in the case Cuomo v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
With more than two-thirds of the states gaining more power under a one-state-one-vote system, it is difficult to believe that the convention will agree to award states votes based on population. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
” In The Brig Wilson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 10:17 am
It is a fact that presidents did not enjoy this broad immunity before six members of the Supreme Court established it in Trump v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:02 pm
Lessons from ILTA: The Digital v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
See, e.g., Kotler v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. [read post]
CA1: the First says that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is constitutional, because it isn't a rule of decision
8 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
Evans v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
In Raines v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 9:46 am
The Jinks plaintiffs worked as door-to-door sales people for an independent sales office, DFW Consultants. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 8:35 pm
Bush v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
" A recent criminal case from Westchester County, People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:15 pm
People want to remove those rights wholesale. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
The only decision of note was Kanter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
If accepted, can this argument be used to discriminate against black people, women, gay people and transgender people? [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm
Lincoln spoke of government "of, by, and for the people. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
And as computers become more and more ubiquitous, the power to arrest anyone who routinely uses a computer is the power to arrest anyone. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
It is thus typically invoked as the basis for invalidating statutory constraints on the president's power to fire people such as heads of independent agencies. [read post]
