Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 13,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2019, 8:26 am
MCL 750.224f(9)(b) states: “Felony” means a violation of law o this state, or of another state, or of the United States that is punishable by imprisonment for 4 years or more, or an attempt to violate such a law. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:40 am
Supreme Court has ruled in Rotkiske v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
Smith weighs in on the pending cert petition in Ackles v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 1:54 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Avanci, Nokia et al.'s motion to transfer Continental's U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
United States, 723 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:39 pm
We as a nation are engaged in titanic struggles over the future of immigration in the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:19 pm
’” The justices asked the U.S. solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in HSBC Holdings v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm
” The reply comes three days after the United States Solicitor General recommended that SCOTUS grant cert in Athena or "another such case", rather than in Hikma Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:28 am
” SG Brief Hikma Both briefs open with the following line: “In the view of the United States, the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- On Friday, the United States filed its brief in response to the March 18, 2019 order of the Supreme Court inviting the Solicitor General to express the views of the United States on the petition for certiorari filed by Petitioners Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and Hikma Pharmaceuticals International Ltd. in Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:02 am
It probably was not a good sign for Texas in Banister v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm
Posts will consider monthly developments in media law across the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Lastly, the cert petition asks whether it violates constitutional due process when expert testimony the state relies on is later shown to be scientifically invalid. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:47 am
When sued for patent infringement, a defendant can still petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the asserted patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) if the petition is filed within one year of service of the complaint. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:47 am
When sued for patent infringement, a defendant can still petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the asserted patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) if the petition is filed within one year of service of the complaint. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
