Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2018, 2:58 am
On appeal in Gomez v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:30 pm
So to borrow Queen Elizabeth’s phrase describing 1992, I will restate the blindingly obvious, 2009 was Annus horribilis. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Additionally, the July events diary of the Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property can be accessed here. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
In Astellas v Teva/Sandoz, Anna Edwards-Stuart took to her feet during trial, as well as Sarah Love for Apple in IDG v Lenovo. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
This could not be said about Kelly v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:30 pm
Beetson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
More on the Sen Times here.On Wednesday 6th of May 2015, Professor Jonathan Griffiths (Queen Mary University) will deliver a talk entitled "Parody and copyright in EU copyright law" at the City University. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:45 pm
Beetson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
” Chappuis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* The Logic of Innovation and IP in Europe Jeremy reviews The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There, from emeritus Kat and eminent academic Johanna Gibson (Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law, Queen Mary University of London) and the fourth edition of Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe, the standard work named after Katfriend and greatly ironic soul Guy Tritton (Hogarth Chambers). [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:55 pm
W v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
The Mishcon de Reya blog has a summary and commentary on the Government’s plans for data protection reform, which were trailed in this year’s Queen’s Speech. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
In another case, Craig v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:46 pm
The top ten posts of the past three months were as follows: What the Defamation Bill means for the internet – Graham Smith News: “Twitter joke” case, rehearing ordered before a three judge court Case Law: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll News: Queens Speech – at last the Defamation Bill Case Law: El Naschie v Macmillan – claim against… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 11:33 am
In People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
While we await the Jones decision, Alberta’s Court of Queen’s Bench rendered another privacy-related tort decision in June 2011 — Martin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:47 pm
In the case of Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:56 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
” He amplified: The Queens action was a proceeding seeking dissolution of MSN, an accounting, and the appointment of a receiver. [read post]
