Search for: "STEVEN LITTLE"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
Kappos, but offers little guidance for patent applicants";IPWatch: "In Bilski Decision, US Supreme Court Adopts Tough But Vague Test for Business Method Patents";Machine or Transformation Test: Timothy J Maier: "Bilski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Once inside the targeted car, the steal man would use a portable computer to program the key to synch to the vehicle's unique code, enabling him to cleanly steal the vehicle with little or no damage to it. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:21 am
Of course, framed in these terms, a functional approach provides little predictability. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
Chicago will lead to “little if any change in the actual extent of gun regulation” by the states. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
Stevens Loses his Majority So what happened? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm
It is a history that was properly brought out in the Alito and Thomas opinions and not seriously disputed in the dissenting opinions authored by Justices Stevens and Breyer. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
Irreversible changes may occur after as little as 2 hours of uninterrupted pressure. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:44 am
In Heller, the Court insisted that the self-defense right was “the central component” of the right to keep and bear arms, despite the fact that it “had little to do with the right’s codification. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
In Heller, the Court insisted that the self-defense right was “the central component” of the right to keep and bear arms, despite the fact that it “had little to do with the right’s codification. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:25 am
Accounting Oversight Board, Kevin Russell concluded that the ruling has little immediate practical impact, but that the legal rule established could have broad long-term effects. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
” Justice Stevens’ echoed this view by writing in his concurrence that business methods patents “can take a particular toll on small and upstart businesses. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:02 am
" Justice Stevens writes this off as little more than the whim or error of a single patent clerk.So, we were one vote away from adding business methods as a fourth judicial exception to patent-eligibility. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Stevens wrote a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Breyer joined. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
By Steven G. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:33 am
It was Justice Stevens final dissent. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
UPDATE #2: I should note that Justice Stevens’ separate dissent in McDonald makes a similar argument to Breyer’s (pp. 35–37 of the slip opinion). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
A Stevens-style ban could have at least lightened their litigation burden. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Dissent Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor, dissented. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
Justices Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotamayor decried the Court’s majority ruling as unnecessary and indeed “fantastic” (but not in a good way). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Justice Stevens sees it differently. [read post]
