Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Plewa is representing Joshua C. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:45 am
Asda’s appeals were dismissed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the “EAT”) (Kerr J) and the Court of Appeal (Lord Sales JSC, Underhill VP and Peter Jackson LJ). [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
Mr Hobbs traces this proposition back through various cases to Leather Cloth Co. v American Leather Cloth Co. (1865) H.L.C. 523.Scandecor Developments AB v Scandecor Marketing AB [2001] UKHL 21 takes us through the changes that have taken place over time to the way trade is conducted and hence the changing conditions that have been applied to the sale of trade marks. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Lamb v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
C. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
& C. 4th 205. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
C. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:17 am
The recent decision of Seiden v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:05 am
See KeyBank N.A. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:05 am
See KeyBank N.A. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm
Cf. the pompous, confused, Delphic, and ultimately verging on useless analysis that Justice Cardozo offered in Welch v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Gatta v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 11:59 am
In addition, all three firms lacked policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that purchasers satisfied the exemption’s requirements.TD, BNY Mellon, and Jefferies agreed to settle without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 1:44 pm
Teksavvy’s counsel spoke briefly at the end of the hearing, which took place on June 25, 2013 but Teksavvy had not previously taken any position.The Copyright Board has just advised that “the Tariff of Levies to Be Collected by CPCC in 2012, 2013 and 2014 on the Sale, in Canada, of Blank Audio Recording Media is scheduled to be published in the Canada Gazette this Saturday, August 31, 2013. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm
The ’532 patent issued in June 2013, about a year before the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am
— a dissenting shareholder appraisal case under BCL § 623 — and the Second Department’s 2010 decision in Matter of Murphy v U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:11 am
§410(c). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
No, b/c it’s competitive/cost-based market. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:05 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court said this in Doe v. [read post]
