Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
The Supreme Court is the highest court of our state. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
House Bill 457 (passed) requires a producer or seller of synthetic turf to disclose to a customer before the sale of synthetic turf the maintenance that is typically performed throughout the lifespan of synthetic turf, as well as the typical costs for removing, replacing, and disposing of synthetic turf. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Both the money and the land in such a transaction are consideration; neither is more important to the public, although at the time of the transaction the money is more important to the seller and the land is more important to the buyer. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
-El Paso 1926, writ ref'd); see First State Bank of Amarillo v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:20 am
Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:12 am
Webster v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:01 am
Sava v. 21st Century Spirits, LLC, 2024 WL 3161625, No. 22 C 6083 (N.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:22 pm
The latest case is Viola Coppela v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am
Clayton stated: "When investors are offered and sold securities - which to date ICOs have largely been - they are entitled to the benefits of state and federal securities laws and sellers and other market participants must follow these laws. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 6:06 am
People's United Bank, NA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
But sometimes the absence of the Oxford comma can make a difference in meaning.Recently, in O’Connor et al v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 8:44 am
V. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
* Fusha v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:18 am
The LawArticle 6 of the InfoSoc Directive states: Obligations as to technological measures1. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
In May 2013, the decision came down in City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
Green v. [read post]
