Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 2921 - 2940 of 3,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 5:59 pm by Duncan
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Amazon’s importing Nestle’s ‘Smarties’ candy upsets US candy seller (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:18 am
(IP Osgoode)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon - Amazon’s importing Nestle’s ‘Smarties’ candy upsets US candy seller (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
The short seller will “kick the sector when it’s already down, making a hefty profit in the process. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
The rise of strict liability occasioned by Judge Traynor’s decision in Greenman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:16 pm by Francis Pileggi
This decision was in the context of notice being mistakenly sent to the escrow agent when the agreement required that notice be sent to the seller. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:24 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  But even then, the court concedes that the state laws of that period (for the states that had any such laws) only regulated sale of concealable weapons, not rifles or shotguns. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
  At all times relevant hereto, the Defendants were manufacturers and sellers of the adulterated food product that is the subject of the action. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 6:03 am
The judges stated that their decision promotes an important goal of the Dram Shop Act, namely motivating sellers of alcohol to exercise greater care in their sales. [read post]