Search for: "Smith v. People" Results 2921 - 2940 of 3,931
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Mark Herrmann
”An order-taking associate returns a half hour later: “Here’s a copy of Smith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:59 pm by Buce
  In the same vein, in law school it struck me that people named Smith and Jones were less likely to get entangled with the law than people named, say, Katzenbach and McClung. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:06 am by David Bernstein
I could not do so entirely, as at least some of my scholarship might give me away; But at least I had the protection that people actually had to read it to realize that.Anybody applying for the Fed Soc fellowship should know that while it might help you in all of the ways that other strong and high quality fellowships can, it also can be and often is seen as a black mark by many people in the legal professoriate.Of course, if it’s already obvious that you are “on the… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Grow - http://tinyurl.com/3dk9rmo (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3gbdrc4 (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) http://tinyurl.com/4xfffbz (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - http://tinyurl.com/3efpac7 (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - http://tinyurl.com/3ojftdf (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 2 -… [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
The front page of the New York Times (May 31, 2011) contains a great story by Peter Lattman, quoting me, on the pending case of Simkin v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:22 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" Yours truly contributed the chapter on Smith v Van Gorkom. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am by Sarnata Reynolds
The Supreme Court struck indefinite detention down as an affront to liberty in Zadvydas v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Conor McEvily
At The Conglomerate, Gordon Smith responds to the Chief Justice’s recent criticism of legal scholarship. [read post]