Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 10,724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 8:56 pm
Since our client resided in Johnson City, TN, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:34 pm
Since our client resided in New Jersey, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
., Wiggins v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
Harper over at Belly of the Beast: The lawyers in Perdue v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:39 am
On August 13, 2018, in McClellan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
However, as demonstrated in myStromer v Revolt, a poorly substantiated protective letter can in fact decrease the chances of a prospective infringer being heard at an inter partes hearing. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:07 am
That's why I absolutely agree with the key lesson from NCAA v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
Depict a person in a funny ad and chances are you’ll lose in court. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
In Salazar v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:16 pm
” The court stated, “it would be incompatible with human dignity … to deprive persons of their freedom without striving towards their rehabilitation and providing them with the chance to regain that freedom at some future date. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From McElrath v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:04 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
Originally, the Test Validation Board stated that the answers to questions 15, 46, and 85 were A, A, and D. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
Supreme Court announced that it will hear Cullen v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 9:54 am
., v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court in Renico v. [read post]
