Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 19,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2021, 9:04 am
Wills v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
Lethem v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:01 am
In murder for hire trial, testimony that another person asked if declarant knew anyone who could complete the murder was admissible as a verbal act; any error in admitting the statement was harmless based on other evidence of guilt, in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:56 am
Eshleman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 7:59 am
Accordingly, the Ontario court ordered that the mother return the child to New York.The mother brought the child back to New York but asked the New York court to dismiss the New York custody action on the ground that New York was not the "home state" of the child under the UCCJEA.The UCCJEA defines the "home state" as "the state in which a child lived with a parent . . . for at least six consecutive months… [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:51 am
In our next installment, we will study the statements made to Grandmother and how the attorney can get these statements admitted into evidence, as well as the case of State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:39 am
AC33405 - State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:54 am
In Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
A jury convicted Murray Hammer of injury to a child, P.H. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
Opinion here: Gila River Indian Community v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:03 pm
[Brazil][Petition granted] Junior v de Sousa 2023 WL 4228163 (N.D. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
,” while at the same time concluding that the provisions of ICWA were inapplicable by stating that “these proceedings…actually escape applicable federal law on Indian Child Welfare. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:42 am
Griffith v. [read post]
