Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 4,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
The Appellate Division held that the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiff's motion to strike stated paragraphs of the defendant's counterclaim on the grounds of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and equitable estoppel. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
However, at the time Davis was decided, the Court had earlier determined in Griggs v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
I. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:34 pm
This was not taken into account by the Division Bench at all; the Court makes a bland reference [“see Adams v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
In contrast, in the courts of appeals, the chief is determined according to seniority. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
Counsel made no motions at the close of petitioner's case and no closing arguments, stating only, "I think everything's been said. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
Moreover, the California Court of Appeal concluded that “the Cipro agreements do not violate the Cartwright Act under [a] rule-of-reason analysis or the analysis the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held to be applicable to settlements of Hatch-Waxman litigation in [Valley Drug Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
It appeared in the National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse Update earlier this year, before our appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Diedjomahor (October 17, 2011), E050935 The Facts The Fourth Appellate Division released a published opinion on October 17, 2011 in the case of Hoag v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Diedjomahor (October 17, 2011), E050935 The Facts The Fourth Appellate Division released a published opinion on October 17, 2011 in the case of Hoag v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
In 2006, the last year for which data was available, the corresponding percentage in state courts was 94. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In IFA Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
I felt that I was about to go over the edge. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department, which last week affirmed the lower court's decision. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:22 am
I don’t know if the Court will bring clarity to the problem or not, since the legislative language is so poorly drafted. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
City of Syracuse and Derek Klink, the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, rejected a defense raised by a driver who hit a pedestrian as she crossed a pedestrian-heavy street. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:15 am
An interesting issue was recently considered by the Court in the case of Muller v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:12 am
And I hit the subject again in June of this year when the Appellate Division, Third Department, also ruled against a law firm. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Erie Coach Lines et al to the New York Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court). [read post]
