Search for: "State v. Greene"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,663
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
The state and territory borders are irrelevant to the media. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:13 am
Aloudi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:09 am
<> Building Association of the Bay Area v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:27 pm
” Because it was undisputed that the employer’s offer of over $3K accounted for double the amount of overtime pay to which she was owed (thus accounting for liquidated damages), and no other procedural complications prevented entry of judgment since no other putative collective plaintiffs had opted into the action, the court concluded that entry of judgment on her FLSA claim was proper (Maximo v. 140 Green Laundromat, July 7, 2015, Failla, K.). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Glatt v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Glatt v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
The Oregon Supreme Court unanimously held this in yesterday’s State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
., Div. of Hotels and Restaurants v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
., Div. of Hotels and Restaurants v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
., Div. of Hotels and Restaurants v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:53 am
This is quite different from the passport provision recently held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:34 pm
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
